Back Policy/Litigation
Back Resolutions
Back Current Initiatives
Back Donate
Default image for pages

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Truist Financial

Year:

2025

Issue Area:

Climate Change

Focus Area:

Climate Financing, Science-Based Targets

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

Managing Climate Risk Through Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Targets and Transition Planning

WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says global GHG emissions must be cut in half by 2030 to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, meet the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. At current emissions trajectories, an estimated 10 percent of global economic value could be lost by 2050.[1]

Banks play a critical role in limiting global temperature rise, and may face serious business risks associated with financing projects or companies lacking alignment with the Paris Agreement’s goals.[2] Financing high-emitting activities poses systemic risks to the global economy, portfolio-wide risks to diversified investors, and serious risks to banks’ own operations (e.g., stranded assets).

While Truist has set 2030 targets for operational emissions, those targets do not include financed emissions. CDP has found that reported financed emissions are on average over 750 times larger than reported operational emissions for financial institutions.[3] So any bank targets that do not include financed emissions are not meaningful.

In its 10-K, Truist recognizes the physical and transition risks associated with climate change that may negatively impact its business, operations, reputation, and clients.[4] The bank also views climate risk as a transverse risk, “meaning it can be a driver of risk across all…primary risk types.”[5] Yet recent reporting has shown the bank is continuing to increase its fossil fuel financing.[6] 

Truist currently ranks first out of the sixty biggest banks globally in terms of its fossil fuel financing as a percentage of its assets. Truist’s financing of fossil fuels reached $14.2 billion in 2023, with a total of $105.3 billion between 2016-2023.[7]

Conversely, competitors have taken risk mitigation steps. For example, Truist’s self-identified peers, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, have set 2030 targets to reduce their financed emissions associated with high-emitting sectors like energy and power generation, adding credibility to their 2050 net zero commitments.[8]

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Truist set and disclose near-term GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should address the bank’s most climate-critical financed emissions, including those associated with lending and investment activities for businesses in the highest emitting sectors.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, proponents recommend, at Board and management discretion: 

Developing a transition plan that describes how the company will meet both its near-term targets and its previously announced 2050 net zero commitment;[9] 
Considering target-setting approaches used by advisory groups such as the Science Based Targets initiative and transition plan guidance published by the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero and the Transition Plan Taskforce. 
Accounting for facilitated emissions (e.g., from underwriting) in the Company’s disclosure and target-setting methodologies become available. [10]

 

[1] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/ 

[2] https://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/measuring-and-addressing-climate-risk-banks 

[3] https://www.cdp.net/en/research/global-reports/financial-services-disclosure-report-2022 

[4] https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/92230/000009223024000010/tfc-20231231.htm 

[5] https://www.truist.com/content/dam/truist-bank/us/en/documents/disclosures/non-lob/truist-2023-corporate-responsibility.pdf 

[6] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-09-10/bankers-doing-oil-deals-others-won-t-are-redrawing-an-old-map 

[7] https://www.bankingonclimatechaos.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/BOCC_2024_vF3.pdf 

[8] https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/documents/Climate-Report-2023.pdf (p.27); https://about.bankofamerica.com/content/dam/about/report-center/esg/2024/Sustainability_at_Bank_of_America_2024_Report.pdf (p.19); https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/about/corporate-responsibility/climate-disclosure.pdf (p.50-52)

[9] https://ir.truist.com/2022-01-27-Truist-Announces-Goal-of-Net-Zero-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-by-2050 

[10] https://carbonaccountingfinancials.com/files/PCAF-PartB-Facilitated-Emissions-Standard-Dec2023.pdf (p.26)

 

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Truist Financial

Year:

2024

Issue Area:

Lobbying & Political Contributions

Focus Area:

Lobbying

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

RESOLVED, the shareholders of Truist Financial Corporation (“Truist”) request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

2. Payments by Truist used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

3. Truist’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4. Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Truist is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Nominating and Governance Committee and posted on Truist’s website.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Full disclosure of Truist’s lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether Truist’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and shareholders’ interests. Truist spent $11,175,900 from 2019 – 2022 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying, where Truist also lobbies. Truist’s lobbying over the debt ceiling has attracted scrutiny.1

Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and undisclosed grassroots activity.2 Truist fails to disclose its payments to trade associations and social welfare groups (SWGs), or the amounts used for lobbying, to shareholders. Truist belongs to the American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Business Roundtable, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and US Chamber of Commerce, which together spent $119,896,000 on federal lobbying for 2022.

Truist’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risks when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Truist publicly supports addressing climate change, yet the Business Roundtable opposed the Inflation Reduction Act,3 the Chamber reportedly has been a “central actor” in dissuading climate legislation over a two-decade period,4 and BPI lobbied the Securities and Exchange Commission to weaken proposed climate disclosure rules.5 A recent analysis looking at inconsistencies between banks’ public climate commitments and their direct and indirect climate lobbying practices noted Truist failed to publicly support the Inflation Reduction Act.6 And while Truist does not belong to or support the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is attacking “woke” investing,7 its trade associations do, as the Chamber sits on its Private Enterprise Advisory Council8 and ABA supported its 2022 annual meeting.9

Reputational damage stemming from these misalignments could harm shareholder value. Truist should expand its lobbying disclosure.

1 https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2023/04/27/whos-lobbying-on-the-debit-ceiling-fight-00094301. 

2 https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publicly-reported/. https://www.truist.com/content/dam/truist-bank/us/en/documents/disclosures/non-lob/truist-2022-tcfd.pdf 

3 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/19/top-us-business-lobby-group-climate-action-business-roundtable. 

4 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/02/climate-group-pushes-big-tech-exit-nations-largest-business-lobby/. 

5 https://www.eenews.net/articles/banks-to-sec-climate-rule-poses-real-world-problems/.

6 https://www.ceres.org/news-center/press-releases/new-benchmark-analysis-us-banks-reveals-inconsistencies-between-climate. 

7 https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2023/03/22/esg-investing-fossil-fuels. 

8 https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2023/09/06/coming-soon-in-ohio-alec-releases-new-raft-of-model-legislation/. 

9 https://documented.net/investigations/heres-who-bankrolling-alec-2022-annual-meeting.