Back Policy/Litigation
Back Resolutions
Back Current Initiatives
Back Donate
Default image for pages

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Sturm Ruger and Company, Inc.

Year:

2024

Issue Area:

Human Rights & Worker Rights, Militarism / Violence

Focus Area:

Gun Safety

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

Prioritization Public Health Impacts Associated with Products

Resolved:

Shareholders ask that the board commission and publish a third party report on (1) the link between the public health costs created by the marketing, promotion and sales of Sturm Ruger’s products and its prioritization of financial returns over public welfare and (2) whether such prioritization threatens the returns of diversified shareholders who rely on a productive economy to support their investment portfolios.

Whereas:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported over 48,000 deaths attributable to firearms in 2022, the equivalent of 132 deaths every day.1 Over 76,000 people annually are injured by firearms.2 Approximately 30,000 people receive inpatient hospital care annually for firearm injuries; 50,000 visit the emergency room; and total health care system costs alone exceed $1B in initial care3 – not including follow-up care. Compared to other nonfatal injuries, nonfatal firearm injury costs increased by $2,495 per person, per month, in the first year following an injury.4 Overall, survivors experience poorer health outcomes, with more pain diagnoses (41%), psychiatric disorders (51%), and substance use disorders (85%) than peers who have not sustained firearm injuries.4 Gunshot survivors’ relatives experience 12% more psychiatric disorders than their peers.4

 

During the pandemic, 60M guns were purchased in the U.S., nearly doubling sales when compared to 15-20 years prior.5 Sturm Ruger 2021 firearms sales alone equaled $730M, and the company’s profits increased by 73% from 2020 – when the company’s profits tripled.6 Ruger’s CEO celebrated the company’s profits on a November 2023 earnings call, attributing part of the growth to its SFAR (small-frame auto-loading rifle) which was the gun used in a recent mass shooting in Lewiston, ME, that killed 18 and wounded 13.7

 

Firearm marketing increasingly glorifies weapons that militarize the common consumer.8 Ruger has marketed the SFAR as “Bigger and Stronger Where it Needs to Be.”7 Ruger is currently in litigation over its marketing of weapons used in a shooting in Boulder, Colorado; victims’ families are suing over the marketing of its AR-556 pistol, saying that the “reckless” and “immoral”

marketing contributed to the mass shooting.9 The marketing practices of firearms manufacturers, including Ruger, have also drawn the concern of the U.S. Congress.10 The reputational impacts of the marketing and sales of products that attract both litigation and congressional interest calls into question the company’s ability to deliver long-term value to shareholders.

 

The cost to the US of gun violence has been estimated at 2.6% of GDP.11 Such systemic costs threaten the diversified portfolios of investors.12 Addressing the costs of gun violence caused by the company’s business practices has the potential to improve the health of our company, our population, our economy, and the diversified portfolios of investors. For these reasons, we urge you to vote “FOR” this proposal.

1 https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/firearms/fastfact.html# 

2 https://www.bradyunited.org/key-statistics#:

3 https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2023/apr/health-costs-gun-violence-how-us-compares-ot her-countries

4 https://hms.harvard.edu/news/hidden-cost-firearm-injuries

5 https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/3960527-americans-bought-almost-60-million-guns-during-the-pandemic/ 

6 https://www.nhbr.com/sturm-ruger-reports-another-boom-year-for-its-firearms/

7 https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/mass-shootings-gun-industry-greed-ravaging-america-1234874423/ 

8 https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/firearms-industry-marketing-mass-shooter/670621/

9 https://apnews.com/article/colorado-supermarket-shooting-lawsuit-gun-maker-bc09ab647f629d3936edde 0de0d64ef5

10 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/top-gun-ceos-testifying-capitol-hill-wake-mass/story?id=87485548

11 https://everytownresearch.org/report/the-economic-cost-of-gun-violence/?_gl=1*1w2fbml*_ga*OTQwNTIwOTg1LjE3MDEyNzg4NTk.*_ga_LT0FWV3EK3*MTcwMTI3ODg1OS4xLjEuMTcwMTI3ODg5NS4wLjAuMA..#executive-summary 

12 https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/universal_ownership_full.pdf

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Sturm Ruger and Company, Inc.

Year:

2023

Issue Area:

Human Rights & Worker Rights, Militarism / Violence

Focus Area:

Gun Safety

Status:

Vote

Vote Percentage:

26.50%


Sturm Ruger and Company, Inc. Material Marketing Risks – Proxy Exempt Solicitation


Resolution Text

Resolved: Shareholders of Sturm Ruger & Co., Inc. (“Ruger”) request that the Board of Directors issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, assessing whether Ruger’s advertising and marketing practices may pose financial and/or reputational risks sufficient to have material impacts on the company’s finances and operations due to levels of gun violence.1

Whereas:

Legislative, media, and public scrutiny around the connection between the marketing of firearms, particularly to young men, and episodes of gun violence are increasing in frequency. The Atlantic recently reported on an “emerging tactical (firearm) market” and a trend in advertising that “reduced the social stigma…for edgy marketing of military-style rifles,” saying that “bad firearms marketing has given us a national nightmare.”2

According to Tufts School of Medicine’s Michael Siegel, who studies the intersection of firearms, marketing, and public health, firearms manufacturers “can heavily influence gun culture through their advertising and marketing practices.” The industry’s marketing “influences a range of aspects of gun culture, including the perceived purpose or uses of guns; the images, symbols, values and identity that is associated with gun ownership; and of course the demographic makeup of the gun-owning population.”3

While firearms manufacturers have found immunity from liability under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, they lose protection if “[a]n action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, if the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought.”4 Recent examples of firearms company actual and potential liability include:

Remington settled for $73 million with families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting, who argued that the company’s marketing violated Connecticut consumer law;5

Victims of the Highland Park (IL) parade massacre sued Smith & Wesson for “illegally targeting its ads at young men at risk of committing mass violence;”6 and

Families of the Uvalde school massacre victims sued Daniel Defense for “aggressive marketing tactics that recklessly endanger children.”7

In July 2022, the House Oversight Committee held a hearing with gun manufacturers including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Christopher Killoy, on the Practices and Profits of Gun Manufacturers, “seeking information on their sale and marketing of AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles and similar firearms.”8 

Ahead of the hearing, the Committee released evidence that gun manufacturers “used disturbing sales tactics—including marketing deadly weapons as a way for young men to prove their manliness.”8

Upon Committee questioning about Ruger’s monitoring of violent events associated with its products, Killoy admitted that Ruger learns of them “through its ‘customer service department,’ the media or from occasional lawsuits.”9

Shareholders believe an assessment of Ruger’s marketing and advertising practices can help ensure that they are not contributing to a culture of gun violence and thereby increasing risks to our company.

1 https://apnews.com/article/gun-violence-science-health-covid-mental-20f5e2cb5fb50ff747fe316fdc4db5c4
2 https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/firearms-industry-marketing-mass-shooter/670621/
3 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supernumbergunporn-how-gunmakers-market-firearms-to-young-american s/ar-AAYdwvA
4 https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/policy-areas/other-laws-policies/gun-industry-immunity/
5 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/15/nyregion/sandy-hook-families-settlement.html
6 https://apnews.com/article/highland-park-july-4-shooting-gun-violence-chicago-873c61100a4d0a44842e82cd75fd 8427
7 https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/29/us/uvalde-victims-lawsuit-gun-manufacturers-school-district
8https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2022.07.27%20Supplemental%20MEMO% 20for%20the%207-27-2022%20FC%20Gun%20Manufacturer%20Hearing.pdf
9 https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/27/gun-companies-made-1-billion-off-assault-weapons-over-10-years-house-pan el-says.html

  

​