Back Policy/Litigation
Back Resolutions
Back Current Initiatives
Back Donate
Default image for pages

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Applied Materials, Inc.

Year:

2024

Issue Area:

Lobbying & Political Contributions

Focus Area:

Lobbying

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

WHEREAS, full disclosure of Applied Materials’ lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our company’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and shareholder interests.

RESOLVED, the shareholders of Applied Materials request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

2. Payments by Applied Materials used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

3. Applied Materials’ membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4. Description of management’s decision-making process and the Board’s oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Applied Materials is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee and posted on Applied Materials’ website.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Applied Materials spent $15,120,000 from 2010 – 2022 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying, where Applied Materials also lobbies but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, Applied Materials spent over $1.5 million on lobbying in California from 2010 – 2022. Applied Materials also lobbies abroad, spending between €200,000 – 299,999 on lobbying in Europe for 2022. And chip makers’ lobbying over curbs on sales to China has drawn media attention.1

Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and undisclosed grassroots activity, and these groups may be spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”2 Applied Materials lists memberships in the Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers, which together have spent over $2.0 billion on federal lobbying since 1998. Applied Materials does not disclose its payments to trade associations and social welfare organizations, or the individual amounts used for lobbying. And Applied Materials does not disclose its contributions to groups which write and endorse model legislation, such as sponsoring the American Legislative Exchange Council.3

Applied Materials’ lack of disclosure presents reputational risk when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Applied Materials publicly supports addressing climate change, yet the Chamber opposed the Paris climate accord. And while our company does not disclose if it belongs to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is attacking “woke capitalism,”4 Applied Materials is represented by its trade association, as the Chamber sits on its Private Enterprise Advisory Council. I urge Applied Materials to expand its lobbying disclosure.

1 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-15/chip-leaders-head-to-washington-to-lobby-for-china-rules-relief#xj4y7vzkg. 

2 https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publicly-reported/. 

3 https://documented.net/reporting/southwest-airlines-chevron-1-800-contacts-and-other-corporations-amongst-sponsors-of-alec-annual-meeting.

4 https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2022/07/27/abandoning-free-market-and-liberty-principles-alec-takes-on-woke-capitalism-bodily-autonomy-and-more-at-its-annual-meeting/.

 

 

Resolution Details

Company:

Applied Materials, Inc.

Year:

2024

Issue Area:

Inclusiveness

Focus Area:

Race Discrimination

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

WHEREAS: Pay inequities persist across race and gender and pose substantial risks to companies and society. Black workers’ median annual earnings represent 77 percent of white wages. The median income for women working full time is 84 percent that of men. Intersecting race, Black women earn 76 percent and Latina women 63 percent.1 At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women in 2130, and Latina women in 2224.2

Citigroup estimates closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated 12 trillion dollars in additional national income. PwC estimates closing the gender pay gap could boost Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries’ economies by 2 trillion dollars annually.3

Actively managing pay equity is associated with improved representation. Diversity in leadership is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.4 Underrepresented minorities represent 19 percent of Applied Materials’s workforce and 5 percent of executives. Women represent 19 percent of the workforce and 13 percent of executives.5

Best practice pay equity reporting consists of two parts:

1. unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high paying roles,

2. statistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles.

Applied Materials does not report quantitative unadjusted or adjusted pay gaps. About 50 percent of the 100 largest

U.S. employers currently report adjusted gaps, and an increasing number of companies disclose unadjusted gaps to address the structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay.6

Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median gender pay gaps.7

RESOLVED Shareholders request Applied Materials report on both quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy and legal compliance information.

Racial/gender pay gaps are defined as the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings (Wikipedia/OECD, respectively).

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance could, with board discretion, integrate base, bonus and equity compensation to calculate:

· percentage median and adjusted gender pay gap, globally and/or by country, where appropriate

· percentage median and adjusted racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, US and/or by country, where appropriate