Back Policy/Litigation
Back Resolutions
Back Current Initiatives
Back Donate
Default image for pages

 

Resolution Details

Company:

American Water Works Company, Inc.

Year:

2024

Issue Area:

Health, Inclusiveness, Water

Focus Area:

Environmental Justice, Human Right to Water, Racial Justice

Status:

Filed

Resolution Text

RESOLVED: Shareholders urge the board of directors to commission an independent, third-party environmental justice assessment (within reasonable time and cost) which assesses the racial impacts of American Water Works’ (“AWK”) operations and produces recommendations for improving them above and beyond legal and regulatory matters. Input from stakeholders, including civil rights organizations and affected community members, should be considered in determining the specific matters for assessment. A report on the assessment, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential information, should be published on the company’s website. 

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Proponents suggest that the assessment and report consider

Disparate environmental and health impacts from its operations;
How governance and management responsibilities of environmental justice issues are allocated within the company;
Quantitative and qualitative metrics on how environmental justice impacts inform business decisions; and
How AWK intends to improve its policies and practices in the future.

Environmental racism is a systemic risk that exacerbates the climate crisis and racial inequities.[1]

AWK reports it has “long considered the impacts and implications of decisions on overburdened communities, adopting environmental justice practices,” but has not disclosed information on such impacts or practices.[2]

Some parties believe assessments are not warranted if there are no controversies. While we believe that it is in AWK’s best interests to conduct an environmental justice assessment regardless of and to avoid controversies, it appears there are at least two unresolved controversies involving AWK.

Cahokia Heights, Illinois: Despite AWK satisfying regulatory requirements in 2023, residents continue to report drinking water that is “brown, foul-smelling, cloudy, [or with] visible particles” and do not use it out of fear of contamination.[3] The city formed from a merger in 2020 which included Centreville, a city with a 93 percent Black population previously established as one of the poorest cities in the country. Described as a “textbook example of environmental racism” by the Illinois governor, Cahokia Heights’ ongoing issues reflect decades of disinvestment.[4]
Marina, California: AWK’s proposed desalination plant is still being appealed and has been characterized as having significant environmental justice concerns by the California Coastal Commission.[5] Marina, where a third of the residents are low-income and many speak limited English, already contains a landfill, sewage plant, and sand mine.[6]

Environmental justice is a priority for legislators. In 2020, New Jersey, where AWK operates, enacted a landmark environmental justice bill that requires impacts on overburdened communities to be a deciding factor in industrial permitting decisions, including water services.[7] California, Pennsylvania, and Illinois have similarly adopted environmental justice legislation that could potentially affect AWK.[8] Moreover, the current administration has made environmental justice a priority through its Justice40 plan. 

We are concerned that a “business as usual” approach could not only perpetuate racial injustice but could pose regulatory and reputational risk to the company.
 

[1] https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/09/22/climate-change-environmental-justice/ 

[2] https://s26.q4cdn.com/750150140/files/doc_downloads/esg_docs/2023/2021-2022-Sustainability-Report.pdf 

[3] https://www.bnd.com/news/local/article281094103.html 

[4] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/raw-sewage-polluted-black-community-now-residents-are-fighting-back-n1277292 

[5] https://www.montereyherald.com/2022/12/03/desalination-cal-am-faces-tough-road-ahead-to-meet-coastal-commission-conditions/, https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2022-11-18/desalination-project-wins-approval-despite-equity-concerns 

[6] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-09-15/cal-am-desalination-coastal-commission-marina-california

[7] https://dep.nj.gov/ej/law/ 

[8] https://www.ncsl.org/environment-and-natural-resources/state-and-federal-environmental-justice-efforts 

 

Resolution Details

Company:

American Water Works Company, Inc.

Year:

2023

Issue Area:

Inclusiveness

Focus Area:

Racial Justice

Status:

Vote

Vote Percentage:

40.02%

Resolution Text

Resolved: Shareholders urge the board of directors to oversee a third-party audit (within a reasonable time and at a reasonable cost) which assesses and produces recommendations for improving the racial impacts of its policies, practices, products, and services, above and beyond legal and regulatory matters. Input from stakeholders, including civil rights organizations, employees, and customers, should be considered in determining the specific matters to be assessed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential/proprietary information, should be published on the company’s website.

Racial equity audits engage companies in a process that internal actions may not replicate, potentially unlocking value, uncovering blind spots, and examining external impacts.

American Water states it “has a strong commitment to employee inclusion, diversity and equity so that we reflect the customers and communities we serve.” Its workforce of 74 percent white, 11 percent Black, 6 percent Latino, 2 percent Asian, and <1 percent Native American and Pacific Islander people fails to reflect the demographics of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Missouri, Illinois, and California, representing 75 percent of operating revenues and 71 percent of its customers.1 American Water’s diversity reporting is not clear about the level of racial and ethnic diversity that has been achieved at executive committee, named executive officer, and board level. Though the company reports having annual goals to increase diversity, they are not public and shareholders cannot evaluate the efficacy of the initiatives.

American Water is also implicated in an environmental justice controversy in Marina, California, where a third of the residents are low-income and many speak limited English.2 The company’s proposed desalination plant in Marina would not supply any of the treated water to the town, which already contains a landfill, a sewage plant, and a sand mine.3 In addition, California American Water in Monterey, which includes Marina, was the most expensive water system in the country in 2017 after previously holding ninth place in 2015.4 We believe the company must consider environmental justice in project planning as it may present ongoing operational and legal risk.

In 2020, former CEO Walter Lynch publicly stated that the company works nationally to pass water privatization legislation and supported H.B. 1416 in Maryland, which community organizations, including the NAACP, opposed.5 Such legislation may have detrimental impacts to communities of color: Black and Latino communities are likelier to experience water affordability issues.6 Maryland’s population is 53 percent non-white, with 42.5 percent being Black or Latino, and 27 percent of such communities living below the poverty line.7 One study examining 500 of the largest community water systems in America attributed privatized water systems as the leading cause of higher water bills and the second dominant factor in affordability issues for low-income communities.8

We urge the company to conduct a racial equity audit to examine its total impact and help dismantle systemic racism.

1 https://data.census.gov/cedsci/tableq=race%20and%20ethnicity%20in%20california,%20new%20jersey,%20illinois,%20pennsylvania,%20and%20 missouri
2 https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-09-15/cal-am-desalination-coastal-commission-marina-california
3 https://www.montereyherald.com/2022/09/07/cal-am-receives-thumbs-up-from-regulator-for-desal-project-application/
4 https://www.publicwaternow.org/most_expensive_water
5 https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2020/ehe/3104_03052020_10315-128.pdf
6 https://www.naacpldf.org/wp-content/uploads/Water_Report_FULL_5_31_19_FINAL_OPT.pdf
7 http://mapadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Maryland-Poverty-Profiles_2020-FINAL.pdf
8 https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/24/3/500/87702/Water-pricing-and-affordability-in-the-US-public

  

​