ICCR Asks the Court for Summary Judgment in its Case Against Texas SB 2337

On January 7, 2026, ICCR filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in its challenge against Texas statute SB 2337. ICCR’s suit, filed in federal court in November 2025 and joined by United Church Funds and Ceres, focused on a newly-adopted law that imposes unprecedented and burdensome unconstitutional obligations on ICCR and similarly-situated organizations. ICCR’s argument is that the provision, which was signed into law in June 2025, abridges freedom of speech in violation of the First Amendment, and is unconstitutionally vague. SB 2337 potentially brings ICCR within the law’s definition of a “proxy advisor,” which would require that the organization make onerous disclosures contrary to the views of its members. There being no outstanding factual issues, ICCR filed its summary judgment motion arguing that, as a matter of law, the court should dismiss the case based on the plaintiffs having demonstrated that there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact.”