Human Rights -Develop
and Adopt Policies
2005 – Boeing Company
WHEREAS, continual allegations
about our Company’s wrongdoings in this country have besmirched its reputation.
As shareholder we also are concerned about what Boeing does elsewhere,
especially with dictatorial governments.
We believe transnational corporations operating in countries with
repressive governments, ethnic conflict, weak rule of law, endemic corruption,
or poor labor and environmental standards face serious reputational risks and
diminished share value if they are seen as responsible for, or complicit in,
human rights violations;
Among the various nations where our country operates, the Peoples
Republic of China has consistently been noted as violating basic human rights.
Yet, Boeing has been called "China's most valuable lobbyist." It has
also worked to have the U.S. government grant China Most Favored Nation status.
Meanwhile, increasingly, it transfers jobs there;
The Wall Street Journal editorialized (09/26/02)
how Christians in China "are harassed, jailed and sometimes killed.
Catholics loyal to the Pope remain persecuted, as are Protestants whose only
crime is reading the Bible, without official authorization, in their own
homes.."
Boeing has no comprehensive human rights policy enabling it to
effectively manage and avoid allegations of aiding and abetting such abuses;
Other global companies have adopted comprehensive human rights
policies based upon the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948);
We believe significant commercial advantages may accrue to Boeing
by adopting a comprehensive human rights policy including: enhanced corporate
reputation, improved employee recruitment and retention, improved community and
stakeholder relations, and reduced risk of adverse publicity, divestment
campaigns, and law suits;
Congressional resolutions have been introduced calling for human
rights criteria for companies operating in China, Tibet and elsewhere;
RESOLVED: shareholders request the Board to develop and adopt a
comprehensive human rights policy to include an explicit commitment to support
and uphold the principles and values contained in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. We suggest the Board adopt such a policy at the earliest possible
time and that it issue a report on the progress made in this regard, especially
in places like China which have consistently been listed as in violation of
basic human rights, no later than November 5, 2005.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: We believe our human rights policy should
include:
1. Workplace standards based upon the core conventions of the
International Labor Organization (ILO Conventions No.29, 87, 98, 100, 105, 111,
138, and 182).
2. Standards regarding the use of security personnel, both private
and host country security forces, that is based upon and consistent with
internationally accepted human rights norms, such as the U.N. Code of Conduct
for Law Enforcement Officials.
3. Human rights and social impact assessment conducted prior to any
decision to invest in countries in civil conflict or which have poor human
rights records, as prepared by the U.S. Department of State.
4. A plan for implementing these commitments and policies
throughout our company's global operations that provides for a secure and
independent complaint mechanism, provisions for consultation with local
affected communities, provisions for social auditing by credible independent
agencies, and provisions for annual public reporting.
Sponsors:
Lead:
Province of St. Joseph of the Capuchin Order (Midwest Capuchins), Rev. Michael
Crosby, OFM, CAP; Christus Health; Congregation Sisters of St.
Agnes; Congregation of the Passion-West; Congregation of the Sisters of Charity
of the Incarnate Word, Houston;