Human Rights -Develop and Adopt Policies

2005 – Boeing Company

 

 

WHEREAS, continual allegations about our Company’s wrongdoings in this country have besmirched its reputation. As shareholder we also are concerned about what Boeing does elsewhere, especially with dictatorial governments.

We believe transnational corporations operating in countries with repressive governments, ethnic conflict, weak rule of law, endemic corruption, or poor labor and environmental standards face serious reputational risks and diminished share value if they are seen as responsible for, or complicit in, human rights violations;

Among the various nations where our country operates, the Peoples Republic of China has consistently been noted as violating basic human rights. Yet, Boeing has been called "China's most valuable lobbyist." It has also worked to have the U.S. government grant China Most Favored Nation status. Meanwhile, increasingly, it transfers jobs there;

The Wall Street Journal editorialized (09/26/02) how Christians in China "are harassed, jailed and sometimes killed. Catholics loyal to the Pope remain persecuted, as are Protestants whose only crime is reading the Bible, without official authorization, in their own homes.."

Boeing has no comprehensive human rights policy enabling it to effectively manage and avoid allegations of aiding and abetting such abuses;

Other global companies have adopted comprehensive human rights policies based upon the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948);

We believe significant commercial advantages may accrue to Boeing by adopting a comprehensive human rights policy including: enhanced corporate reputation, improved employee recruitment and retention, improved community and stakeholder relations, and reduced risk of adverse publicity, divestment campaigns, and law suits;

Congressional resolutions have been introduced calling for human rights criteria for companies operating in China, Tibet and elsewhere;

RESOLVED: shareholders request the Board to develop and adopt a comprehensive human rights policy to include an explicit commitment to support and uphold the principles and values contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We suggest the Board adopt such a policy at the earliest possible time and that it issue a report on the progress made in this regard, especially in places like China which have consistently been listed as in violation of basic human rights, no later than November 5, 2005.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: We believe our human rights policy should include:

1. Workplace standards based upon the core conventions of the International Labor Organization (ILO Conventions No.29, 87, 98, 100, 105, 111, 138, and 182).

2. Standards regarding the use of security personnel, both private and host country security forces, that is based upon and consistent with internationally accepted human rights norms, such as the U.N. Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials.

3. Human rights and social impact assessment conducted prior to any decision to invest in countries in civil conflict or which have poor human rights records, as prepared by the U.S. Department of State.

4. A plan for implementing these commitments and policies throughout our company's global operations that provides for a secure and independent complaint mechanism, provisions for consultation with local affected communities, provisions for social auditing by credible independent agencies, and provisions for annual public reporting.

 



Sponsors:

Lead: Province of St. Joseph of the Capuchin Order (Midwest Capuchins), Rev. Michael Crosby, OFM, CAP; Christus Health; Congregation Sisters of St. Agnes; Congregation of the Passion-West; Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, Houston;