Diversity on the Board of Directors

WHEREAS:

We believe that board diversity is not a social imperative, but a strategic one. Diversified boards promote better understanding of the market place and this understanding can lead to increased revenues and profitability.

We believe board diversity enhances shareholder value. A growing body of academic research shows that there is a significant positive relationship between the percentage of women or minorities on boards and firm value. This is a view strongly supported by Connecticut State Treasurer Denise L. Nappier, principal fiduciary of the $18 billion Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Fund, who believes that "shareholder value and corporate bottom lines are enhanced by an independent and diverse board."

We believe diversity provides for more effective problem solving and decision making and even high caliber boards can suffer from "group think" if not infused with different perspectives.

We believe that boards that look more like the workforce can help dispel negative stereotypes and catalyze efforts to recruit, retain, and promote the best people including women and minorities.

We believe board diversity is a growing focal point for social investors, who now account for one in eight dollars invested. Increasingly, all-white all-male boards are viewed negatively by these investors which may diminish your attractiveness to an important investor community. For example, TIAA-CREF, an institutional investor with over $270 billion in assets under management has issued a set of corporate governance guidelines which include a call for "diversity of directors by experience, sex and race;"

We believe that the Board of Directors or its Nominating Committee should take every reasonable step to ensure that women and minorities are a routine part of every board search the company undertakes.

BE IT RESOLVED:

That the Board of Directors, or its Nominating Committee, in its search for suitable board candidates, makes a greater effort to search for qualified women and minority candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors. To that end, we request that the company provide to shareholders, at reasonable expense, four months from the date of the 2003 annual meeting, a report which includes a description of:

1. The company's efforts to encourage diversified representation on the board.
2. A description of the criteria for selecting board candidates.
3. A description of the process used to select board nominees.
4. A description of the process used to select the board's nominating committee members.