Independent Chair and CEO

Our government is predicated on the constitutional doctrine of separating powers as a way of providing a checks and balances system that ensures proper oversight. While somewhat messy at times, the system has worked to safeguard against an over-consolidation of power that could threaten our democracy. As boards of directors are empowered to hire and fire company CEOs at their own discretion, it is critical that the roles of Board Chair and CEO remain independent of one another to avoid obvious  conflicts of interest. This is a fundamental  yet critical tenet of good corporate governance: separate chair and CEO roles promotes improved oversight, reduces exposure and risk and improves the performance of both the board and management. 


Featured ICCR Initiative

Separation of Chair and CEO positions. ICCR members recommend separation of a corporation’s CEO and Chair positions as a fundamental question of good corporate governance to de-consolidate power and strengthen board oversight of key management. Shareholder resolutions urging separation of CEO and Chair averaged high proxy votes of over 25% at 5 of the 6 companies at which these resolutions went to a
vote in 2013, an indication of strong and growing investor support.

This year, ICCR members asked 6 companies, including Chevron, Exxon Mobil and J.P. Morgan Chase, to amend their bylaws to require that the Chair of the board of directors be an independent member
of the board.


Featured Resources

CalPERS' "Global Principles of Accountable Corporate Governance"

Fox Investors Excluding Murdoch Back Job Split by 3 to 1 Margin 






JP Morgan's Day of Reckoning

Jamie Dimon's Fate in Shareholder Hands: JPMorgan's Day of Reckoning

The Corporate Examiner

* indicates required